<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Somewhat Manly Nerd &#187; more excel fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/tag/more-excel-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog</link>
	<description>infrequent blogging from some dude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 18:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Scientific Bond Meter</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2009/03/04/the-scientific-bond-meter/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2009/03/04/the-scientific-bond-meter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 06:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more excel fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=1362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So a few days ago, I posted a Scientific Trilogy Meter, which was an average of the user ratings from IMDB and the critic ratings from Rotten Tomatoes. Today, I am applying the same method to only one series, the most successful film series in history. &#8220;Bond, James Bond&#8221; has to face the reckoning of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a few days ago, I posted a <a href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2009/02/18/the-scientific-trilogy-meter/">Scientific Trilogy Meter</a>, which was an average of the user ratings from IMDB and the critic ratings from Rotten Tomatoes. Today, I am applying the same method to only one series, the most successful film series in history. &#8220;Bond, James Bond&#8221; has to face the reckoning of my excel spreadsheet.</p>
<p>The results are displayed in their beautiful glory below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="roger moore kinda sucked, huh" src="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/pics/bondmeter.jpg" alt="" width="596" height="345" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Perhaps the first few films are propped up by especially forgiving RT ratings, but I do think many people regard <em>From Russia with Love</em> to be the best, and I know almost everyone loved <em>Casino Royale</em>. I&#8217;m not going to bother adding much of my own commentary or opinion, as I haven&#8217;t even seen half of the series. Although, all the Brosnan films after <em>Goldeneye</em> were shit, that much I know. Other than that, I think both Connery and Craig are awesome and that it&#8217;s no surprise to see their films on top.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">If you wish for the underlying statistics, or at least a Y-axis with&#8230;ok, I&#8217;m going to stop there. Just trust me that this the most accurate depiction of the relative quality of the EON, canonical Bond films ever created. If you really care, just e-mail me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2009/03/04/the-scientific-bond-meter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
