<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Somewhat Manly Nerd &#187; internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/tag/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog</link>
	<description>infrequent blogging from some dude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 09:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Destroyed This Blog</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2013/01/14/twitter-destroyed-this-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2013/01/14/twitter-destroyed-this-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dickey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oculus rift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=3409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have I explained how Twitter rendered 90% of the posts I used to populate this blog with obsolete? Probably, but I&#8217;m going to ramble for a little while anyhow.
For example, I sent out a tweet a couple of hours ago about how I&#8217;m really excited about the Oculus Rift, a 3D headset that monitors how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have I explained how Twitter rendered 90% of the posts I used to populate this blog with obsolete? Probably, but I&#8217;m going to ramble for a little while anyhow.</p>
<p>For example, I sent out <a href="https://twitter.com/CajoleJuiceEsq/status/290695150412369920">a tweet</a> a couple of hours ago about how I&#8217;m really excited about the <a href="http://www.oculusvr.com/">Oculus Rift</a>, a 3D headset that monitors how you move your head while immersed in a video game. In the tweet, I said it seems so much cooler than the Wii or Kinect or traditional 3D, while adding a link to <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/7/3848914/oculus-rift-deep-inside-the-immersive-disorienting-virtual-reality">The Verge article</a> on it. There&#8217;s not much else interesting I could have added to those thoughts. Two or three years ago, I would have embedded a YouTube video about it and spit out a couple of paragraphs about the gaming possibilities and how awesome or nauseating it would be to play <em>Mirror&#8217;s Edge</em> while wearing the Oculus Rift.</p>
<p>Back then, I also had more real-life friends who read this blog at least occasionally. Due to the lack of updates, and not posting links to this blog on Facebook due to keeping my real name and this internet handle separate (half-assedly), the people reading any posts on this blog are almost all internet friends who are already exposed to my thoughts on Twitter. So the only things worth writing here are sufficiently thoughtful and lengthy posts, something akin to this <a href="http://www.amazinavenue.com/2012/12/21/3786236/why-im-ok-with-saying-goodbye-to-r-a-dickey">R.A. Dickey fanpost</a> I put together over at Amazin&#8217; Avenue. Maybe I should re-post that piece here just so it looks like I still care about this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2013/01/14/twitter-destroyed-this-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Shallows and What The Internet Is Doing To My Brain</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2012/02/08/the-shallows-and-what-the-internet-is-doing-to-my-brain/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2012/02/08/the-shallows-and-what-the-internet-is-doing-to-my-brain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isaac asimov owned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it's fucking distracting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicolas carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the shallows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=3322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I recently finished Nicholas Carr&#8217;s The Shallows, a book I picked up and read over a few stints at Barnes &#38; Noble because the topic caught my eye and it was only 225 pages long. I have to imagine anyone who has spent countless hours on the internet (most likely anyone reading this) would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="i don't remember jack shit from wikipedia" src="http://bookcoverarchive.com/images/books/the_shallows.large.jpg" alt="" width="197" height="300" /> I recently finished Nicholas Carr&#8217;s <em>The Shallows</em>, a book I picked up and read over a few stints at Barnes &amp; Noble because the topic caught my eye and it was only 225 pages long. I have to imagine anyone who has spent countless hours on the internet (most likely anyone reading this) would be interested in how their neural circuity has been rewired to handle a bunch of meaningless shit. This book puts forth the conclusion &#8212; with plenty of studies to back it up &#8212; that the constant distraction of the internet isn&#8217;t conducive to long-term memory or particularly deep thinking. There&#8217;s even a study mentioned that attempts to quantity the effects on memory of a quiet country setting as opposed to the busy, loud streets of a city &#8212; basically the real-world equivalents of reading a book and browsing the internet.</p>
<p>The idea of our brains being rewired to acclimate to the internet probably isn&#8217;t a surprise to anyone who can&#8217;t go a few minutes without checking their e-mail or Twitter or Facebook or forum of choice. We (I say &#8220;we&#8221; since I&#8217;m one of these people) want everything as quickly as possible and without that constant flow of information we feel disconnected from the world. Even while reading this book, I probably checked my iPod Touch at an average rate of two times a chapter. (Yes, I carry around my iPod Touch because I&#8217;m too poor to want to pay $90/mo for an iPhone and I live in the city now and there&#8217;s always a hotspot nearby even if I&#8217;m not on campus.)</p>
<p>I had already read about a study cited in this book that revealed students did better on a reading comprehension quiz of a short essay when they were given a plain text version (or a paper version, I forget) as opposed to a version filled with hyperlinks. Clicking on a hyperlink has the effect of breaking your concentration and not allowing your brain to absorb the information in its entirety, even if it seems like you&#8217;re learning more by reading the content of the hyperlinks. The reason posited for this phenomenon is the limit of the brain for working memory. Possible long-term memory is practically infinite, but such retention is only attained after memories are allowed to be stored in the hippocampus for the required amount of time, which can apparently range from an a few minutes to years.</p>
<p>I was probably most intrigued when Carr went through history and talked about the effects of other technological advances on the workings of the mind. He writes about the invention of the book, the printing press, the clock, the phonograph, etc., citing reactions from prominent scientists and thinkers, and detailing where they were right and where they were wrong. It&#8217;s almost strange to think that a transition from handwriting to typewriters could have an effect on the content, tone, and structure of someone&#8217;s writing, but there are a few anecdotes mentioned that seem to suggest otherwise; one being that the flow of cursive lends itself to more meandering sentences compared to the staccato of a typewriter.</p>
<p>A theme running through all this discussion of technology and its effects on humanity as a whole and on an individual level is that there&#8217;s never any turning back (unless we bomb ourselves to hell, I guess). The internet is only becoming increasingly prominent in our lives and the trend in all likelihood will not reverse. When new forms of media were created, others were never done away with entirely. Newspapers didn&#8217;t kill books. Television didn&#8217;t kill the radio. The internet hasn&#8217;t killed anything yet, but it <em>is </em>the first technology that has been able to absorb and provide practically every form of communication the human race has created. And it has greatly affected every other form of media. Many magazines are now laid out more like webpages and there are television shows like <em>Tosh.0</em> that live off YouTube clips.</p>
<p>But maybe it&#8217;s bullshit to worry about the internet-ization of our brains. It&#8217;s not like reading is an activity the human brain is particularly evolved for; a person needs to develop a love of reading, which in turn leads the brain to crave more of a similar stimulus. I feel as if I&#8217;ve had to work to get back into reading at length, or even watching full movies at home, but I like to think I&#8217;m almost there. And it does feel more satisfying to finish a book or watch a great film than it does to jump around reading blogs or watching 20 minute television show episodes. But is it efficient? When Carr posed this question to some very intelligent people, a number of them said they don&#8217;t even read books anymore because it&#8217;s just not worth the time and effort when the internet is so easily searchable &#8212; just Wikipedia it! Well, you probably indirectly Wikipedia it by googling it first.</p>
<p>I mean Google because there&#8217;s an entire chapter of this book dedicated to the search giant. The search giant that has attempted to get its fingers into every inch of the internet and subsequently our lives. They want to know everything and they want everything to be searchable. The ideas of Sergey Brin mentioned in The Shallows point to the idea of a massive internet cloud singularity in the future of humanity. Perhaps this is inevitable, considering the march of technological progress and the willingness of people to upload as much as possible. Just thinking about such a possibility reminds me of <a href="http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html">&#8220;The Last Question&#8221; by Isaac Asimov</a>, one of the favorite short stories. Try to read it without being distracted by the rest of the internet.</p>
<p>As written about by Carr, a move toward such a future would be scarier than the idea of our brains just being overloaded with too much data and not developing enough deep knowledge, as it would basically end all individuality. Although the two are linked &#8212; if you&#8217;re not forming individual thoughts through personal reading and writing, then it&#8217;s all external, which basically means the internet going forward. Already, people on the internet group together around similar interests, e.g., politics or sabermetrics, developing thoughts and worldviews alongside each other virtually. Sure, have a predilection for such behavior, but the internet only exacerbates the narrowing of experience. Imagine such an echo chamber effect across the entire human race. Or maybe just watch episode 2 of the British television series <em>Black Mirror</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2012/02/08/the-shallows-and-what-the-internet-is-doing-to-my-brain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m Too Lazy to Write a Coherent and Focused Blog Post</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2012/02/04/im-too-lazy-to-write-a-coherent-and-focused-blog-post/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2012/02/04/im-too-lazy-to-write-a-coherent-and-focused-blog-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new year's resolutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=3319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, maybe I can manage coherent. I just can&#8217;t think of a good title for a post that will consist of me writing about my non-existent New Year&#8217;s resolutions and whether or not I am succeeding in carrying them out. And also writing about random other thoughts that seem to have to do with being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, maybe I can manage coherent. I just can&#8217;t think of a good title for a post that will consist of me writing about my non-existent New Year&#8217;s resolutions and whether or not I am succeeding in carrying them out. And also writing about random other thoughts that seem to have to do with being a better person or not &#8212; maybe not even &#8220;better,&#8221; just more functional.</p>
<p><strong>ALCOHOL</strong></p>
<p>I was thinking before New Year&#8217;s Eve that perhaps I should cut down on the drinking in 2012. Then when I woke up the next morning to a text from my good friend saying I should probably apologize to his long-time girlfriend for calling her a &#8220;cunt&#8221; multiple times, I <em>really</em> thought it would be a good time to take a break. Important note: this is only because she&#8217;s awesome; if she were really a cunt, I wouldn&#8217;t have felt bad.</p>
<p>Of course, at 10pm the next day my roommate busts into the apartment and tells me to put some pants on (I had pajamas on, ok?) because &#8220;we&#8217;re fucking going out.&#8221; I wish I could say he wasn&#8217;t going to take no for an answer, but it was just me displaying my total lack of willpower. Insecurity tends to leave one susceptible to peer pressure. Luckily, since I got such a late start, I was able to contain myself fairly well. The next Sunday was a different story.</p>
<p>Holding a football party for a game that starts at 1pm is dangerous. By 6:30 or so (after everyone had left), I was all ready to stop drinking. Then my roommate and his girlfriend went into his bedroom to partake in an activity I haven&#8217;t experienced in a while which I know I can when I go to <a href="https://www.sexdatingapps.com/">https://www.sexdatingapps.com/</a>. Thus, it was time to go to Village Pourhouse to meet up with some of our earlier guests. Would I have heard them fucking if I stayed in the apartment with the Steelers-Broncos game blasting? Probably not. Have I heard them before? Plenty of times. But I wasn&#8217;t going to watch Tebow Time alone when I could be watching it in a bar among massive alcoholics &#8212; and I mean massive in both drinking quantity and physical size.</p>
<p>My plan was to grab something to eat immediately after the end of the Steelers-Broncos game. As it turned out, I was abandoned by four girls who had walked up into my general area right before the Tebow Miracle. In my despondence, I was sucked into stepping foot in another bar. Minutes later, the 35-year-old, 6&#8217;5&#8243; Russian alcoholic I was hosting a couple of hours earlier ordered 10 tequila shots for three people. One of these three people was a 40-year-old woman (estimating) who didn&#8217;t want to drink any of the shots. As a result, I ended up downing three or four of the tequila shots.</p>
<p>After reaching a transcendent level of drunkenness, I figured it&#8217;d be a good idea to harass the cute bartender who had just gotten off her shift. I even tried to make light of the incessant drunken wooing she must encounter every day she works. It seemed to work, because I do remember talking to her for a significant amount of time. What I don&#8217;t remember is anything after she plugged her phone number into my phone. It was as if my brain decided to turn off the second it knew it had done its job. &#8220;Welp, you got an attractive female&#8217;s number? Time to shut down for the night.&#8221; I later arrived at my apartment unable to open the locks with my keys and cursing out the door for not letting me in and then screaming like a possessed person while I lay in bed.</p>
<p>The bartender never responded to my later text.</p>
<p><strong>WOMEN</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how much I need to expand on this topic, considering the initial section of this blog post. I did get the number of another bartender on Monday night, though. Unfortunately, it ended up being the wrong number. I figured this would happen after I asked the girl for her number, I typed it into my phone knowing it was wrong, asked her if the last four digits I had typed into my phone were right, she said they were wrong, and I typed them in half-heartedly knowing they were wrong yet again but didn&#8217;t want to ask a third time. Fuck. Me.</p>
<p>I also have replaced one unhealthy online obsession (which existed in the real world for a short period of time) with another unhealthy online obsession. Is this progress?</p>
<p><strong>BLOGGING</strong></p>
<p>I took a three month break between posts. It has been about an additional month&#8217;s wait for another post. This is obviously unacceptable. And while I haven&#8217;t made much progress on this individual blog front, I have created a baseball blog at <a href="http://secondsquadsorrows.com" target="_blank">Second Squad Sorrows</a>. I credit former Roto Hardball colleague and fellow long-distance relationship sufferer <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/scottskillings" target="_blank">@scottskillings</a> with pushing me to create the blog. Mets and White Sox fans together to wallow in the patheticness of their respective teams. Wonderful.</p>
<p><strong>INTERNET</strong></p>
<p>I want to spend less time on the internet; I assume most people nowadays feel the same way. I have not improved at all since the calendar flipped over to 2012. I feel comfortable in assuming this is the case for most people who try to cut internet social interaction out of their lives. I know one person on NeoGAF who has just replaced his NeoGAF forum time with tweets and YouTube comments. YOUTUBE COMMENTS. It doesn&#8217;t get any more desperate than commenting on YouTube. That is like when Josh Hamilton took whatever painkillers he could to simulate his Oxycodane addiction (note: I have no idea how accurate this is).</p>
<p><strong>EXERCISE</strong></p>
<p>It took me about a month, but I finally did some intense exercise in 2012. And it was only due to the insistence of my roommate&#8217;s girlfriend. And it was only for 15 effective minutes out of a total 30. It was the P90X Ab Ripper X video and it&#8217;s four days later and my hip flexors still hurt. Goddamn it. I better take at least a couple of runs this week or else the indoor soccer game I have next Friday is going to be an unmitigated disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2012/02/04/im-too-lazy-to-write-a-coherent-and-focused-blog-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2011/09/18/thoughts-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2011/09/18/thoughts-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=3276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is entitled &#8220;Thoughts on Twitter&#8221; instead of &#8220;Twitter Thoughts&#8221; because wouldn&#8217;t the latter just consist of tweets? God, I&#8217;m such a faggot sometimes &#8212; in the Louis C.K. &#8220;people from Phoenix are Phoenicians&#8221; stand-up sort of way.
- Since I didn&#8217;t make a 9/11 post here a week ago, I&#8217;ll just mention how I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This post is entitled &#8220;Thoughts on Twitter&#8221; instead of &#8220;Twitter Thoughts&#8221; because wouldn&#8217;t the latter just consist of tweets? God, I&#8217;m such a faggot sometimes &#8212; in the Louis C.K. &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IFloXOuLgA&amp;t=1m25s">people from Phoenix are Phoenicians</a>&#8221; stand-up sort of way.</em></p>
<p>- Since I didn&#8217;t make a 9/11 post here a week ago, I&#8217;ll just mention how I do not give a shit where people were when the planes hit or the towers fell. We were all in class or at work or sleeping, I get it. If you&#8217;re going to write something like <a href="http://www.ranyontheroyals.com/2011/09/ten-years-later.htmlhttp://www.ranyontheroyals.com/2011/09/ten-years-later.html">Rany Jazayerli did</a>, that&#8217;s cool, but 140 characters is just garbage in this case.</p>
<p>- It&#8217;s pretty amazing how people &#8212; on my feed, at least &#8212; show up when a sporting event gets really interesting. I like to think Twitter has allowed people to see many more no-hitters, 5-set Grand Slam tennis matches, and overtime Stanley Cup playoff games.</p>
<p>- I don&#8217;t understand people who follow a few select people who exclusively tweet about one topic. I follow people I find interesting or amusing, regardless of content. It just so happens I follow a very large percentage of baseball (and Mets) fans because they are the people I come across most. I&#8217;m sure this has nothing to do with my own tweeting habits.</p>
<p>- My follower count really wishes I were an attractive girl, or at least played one on the internet.</p>
<p>- Every person I&#8217;ve talked to about Keith Law (<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/keithlaw">@keithlaw</a>) thinks he comes across as arrogant (<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/CajoleJuiceEsq/statuses/62631849943515136">and even Michael Lewis jumped in this week</a>). But he&#8217;s still the only ESPN employee (outside of Grantland writers) I follow, due to him being, you know, <em>intelligent</em>.</p>
<p>- I&#8217;ve said this before, but I should have quit Twitter afterÂ <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/CajoleJuiceEsq/statuses/62631849943515136">this tweet</a>.</p>
<p>- Does everyone remember when you could see all the tweets from someone who you followed, even the replies to people you didn&#8217;t also follow? I definitely remember the uproar when that changed. Can you imagine how much of a disaster your feed would be if that magically changed back?</p>
<p>- <em>Drive</em> has to be garnering the most polarizing movie tweet reviews I&#8217;ve ever seen. It&#8217;s either &#8220;fuck awesome&#8221; or &#8220;one of the worst movies I&#8217;ve ever seen.&#8221;</p>
<p>- Outside of the previously linked Ayn Rand fatality tweet, I really don&#8217;t understand why I come up with my best Twitter material when everyone is asleep. I guess it&#8217;s probably because once my head hits my pillow I have to choose between thinking about my life or coming up with humorous tweets; the latter is much less stressful. Honestly, unwinding with some <a href="https://indacloud.co/product/sleep-gummies-40-count-jar-sugar-free/">indacloud</a> beforehand makes the late-night creativity flow even easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2011/09/18/thoughts-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>REAL TALK &#8211; 12/4/10</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/12/04/real-talk-12410/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/12/04/real-talk-12410/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris bosh sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subtitles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the prisoner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=3131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has definitely cut into my REAL TALK post ideas, considering I usually post any short interesting or amusing thoughts on there. But it&#8217;s definitely been too long since one of these.
- The difference between the David Wright mentions in my last two REAL TALK posts is hilarious and depressing. June:Â He&#8217;s awesome! August:Â He sucks!
- How [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Twitter has definitely cut into my REAL TALK post ideas, considering I usually post any short interesting or amusing thoughts on there. But it&#8217;s definitely been too long since one of these.</em></p>
<p>- The difference between the David Wright mentions in my last two REAL TALK posts is hilarious and depressing. June:Â <a href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/06/28/real-talk-62810/">He&#8217;s awesome!</a> August:Â <a href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/08/15/real-talk-81510/">He sucks!</a></p>
<p>- How is it that women just <em>know</em> when you have given up on or forgotten them and subsequently decide to initiateÂ intimaciesÂ again?</p>
<p>- <em>The Prisoner</em> (1967) is one of the weirdest television shows I have ever seen, but it also has one of the best openings ever.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AL7npkSXZE">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AL7npkSXZE</a></p>
</p>
<p>- Who decided Chris Bosh was a great basketball player? I&#8217;m asking because due to my lack of basketball knowledge nowadays, I was led to believe he would make a perfect third man for the Wade-LeBron duo. Is this like the baseball writers who thought Jeff Francoeur was good?</p>
<p>- Someone needs to manufacture aÂ breathalyser for people to log on to their computers.</p>
<p>- I think forgetting to wear a belt for the second time in a month is grounds for being committed (I&#8217;m losing my mind).</p>
<p>- Â The American public seriously needs to stop being averse to subtitles. <em>Inglourious Basterds</em> did well because it was by Quentin Tarantino and featured plenty of English, allowing it to hide the presence of subtitles in its marketing. I remember telling my &#8220;boss&#8221; to watch it and when I mentioned subtitles he groaned and I wanted to slam his face into the nearby desk.</p>
<p>- I must be one of the few internet-obsessed people left in the Western world without a smartphone.</p>
<p>- As great as the Mets&#8217; front office now is, it&#8217;s going to be a depressingly inactive offseason for them. But hearing your GM say that their top starting pitching prospect is not going to be used in the bullpen as a stopgap anymore can&#8217;t help but beÂ encouraging.</p>
<p>- Building a PC is less intimidating to me than preparing a multi-course dinner for two. Unfortunately, only the latter helps you get laid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/12/04/real-talk-12410/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Have Invites To A Torrent Tracker I Want You To Enjoy</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/05/18/i-have-invites-to-a-torrent-tracker-i-want-you-to-enjoy/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/05/18/i-have-invites-to-a-torrent-tracker-i-want-you-to-enjoy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 05:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie brooker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edgar wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misfits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitchell and webb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newswipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peep show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simon pegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the thick of it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thebox.bz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=2785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The invite doesn&#8217;t come until you read this post, though. Or at least until you pretend to have read it.
I must have wanted to make this thread for around two months now. Once I was invited to thebox.bz I quickly acquainted myself with the amazingness of Newswipe &#8211; basically the UK&#8217;s answer to The Daily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The invite doesn&#8217;t come until you read this post, though. Or at least until you pretend to have read it.</p>
<p>I must have wanted to make this thread for around two months now. Once I was invited to <a href="http://thebox.bz/">thebox.bz</a> I quickly acquainted myself with the amazingness of <em>Newswipe &#8211;</em> basically the UK&#8217;s answer to <em>The Daily Show</em>. Only instead of episodes every weeknight throughout the year, Newswipe follows the usual British TV schedule of six episodes each year. This allowsÂ <em>Newswipe</em> to maintain its high quality throughout an entire run, except for the poetry segments (you&#8217;ll see what I mean).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go ahead and post a segment from the show &#8212; despite it already made the rounds on the internet multiple times &#8212; because it is <em><strong>that</strong></em> perfect.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHun58mz3vI&#038;fmt=18">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHun58mz3vI</a></p>
</p>
<p>Charlie Brooker is really, really awesome. I did a little wiki&#8217;ing and I found out that <em>Newswipe</em> is actually a spinoff of the more popular <em>Screenwipe</em>, in which Brooker rips on (I assume) British television. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s awesome, but I&#8217;ve never had the urge to watch, due to my non-existent knowledge of the vast majority of television across the pond.Â Except for one show, of course. And that would be <em>Peep Show</em>. But I highly doubt he makes fun of that show, <a href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2009/11/25/the-best-show-youve-never-seen-if-youre-a-fellow-american/">since it&#8217;s fucking awesome</a>.</p>
<p>Since I was on a Charlie Brooker <em>-wipe</em> binge, I noticed something called <em>Gameswipe</em> on thebox.bz as well. That was an extremely entertaining 50-minute rundown of gaming history. So basically, anything Charlie Brooker is involved in proves to be awesome. Which means I need to get around to checking out <em>You Have Been Watching</em>. The following is the only clip I&#8217;ve seen from it, and I&#8217;m still recovering from the knowledge that <a href="http://www.bibleman.com/">BIBLEMAN is real</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EIS5_kpS4c&#038;fmt=18">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EIS5_kpS4c</a></p>
</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I also need to check out <em>That Mitchell and Webb Look</em>, since it&#8217;s the same guys (David Mitchell and Robert Webb) who star inÂ <em>Peep Show</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">And then there&#8217;s <em>The Thick of It</em>, the television series which <em>In The Loop</em> &#8212; probably the funniest movie of last year &#8212; was based on. Oh oh, and <em>Misfits</em>, which I actually have watched. It&#8217;s been described as a cross between the British teen drama <em>Skins</em> (which I&#8217;ve never seen) and <em>Heroes</em>. That probably doesn&#8217;t sound all that good to a discerning American TV viewer, but it&#8217;s pretty fun. It&#8217;s like if <em>Heroes</em> starred all teenagers with superpowers, but actually featuredÂ competentÂ writing. And there&#8217;s swearing. And tits. I hope it sounds more enticing now.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">So now you have a list of shit you should download if you ask for an invite (which you obviously should do):</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em><strong>Peep Show<br />
Newswipe<br />
Gameswipe<br />
You Have Been Watching<br />
That Mitchell and Webb Look<br />
Misfits<br />
The Thick of It</strong></em></p>
<p>Just make sure to keep your ratio above 1.00, alright?</p>
<p>Edit: You should probably check out <em><strong>Spaced</strong></em>, too. If only because it&#8217;s by the same guys behind <em>Shaun of the Dead</em> and <em>Hot Fuzz.</em> I really need to start taking my own advice, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/05/18/i-have-invites-to-a-torrent-tracker-i-want-you-to-enjoy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Remember Now Why I Always End Up Switching Back to Firefox</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/22/i-remember-now-why-i-always-end-up-switching-back-to-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/22/i-remember-now-why-i-always-end-up-switching-back-to-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=2632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only a month ago, I said that I had probably made a permanent move to Google Chrome as my primary internet browser, but its bugs and quirks are starting to wear on me. This has happened at least a couple of times before.
- The slow animated GIF problem will always be there. And in addition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a month ago, I said that <a href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/03/22/i-think-ive-made-a-permanent-move-to-google-chrome/">I had probably made a permanent move to Google Chrome</a> as my primary internet browser, but its bugs and quirks are starting to wear on me. This has happened at least a couple of times before.</p>
<p>- The slow animated GIF problem will always be there. And in addition to that, I had heard some Mac users complain about how GIFs need to load completely before they animated at all, but I hadn&#8217;t come across it until a couple of weeks ago. Thankfully, it only lasted for a day or two. I have no idea what happened.</p>
<p>- When I was recently looking for info on golf handicaps, I was directed to About.com and when I got there, the correct formatting flashed for about 0.3 seconds before reverting back to a 1995-style webpage with no formatting whatsoever. I try reloading numerous times and the same thing happened everytime. And it happened with a bunch of About.com pages. But hey, it seems to be working now!</p>
<p>- Highlighting text can be extremely wonky sometimes. I have no way to expand on this &#8212; it&#8217;s just very annoying.</p>
<p>- Almost every time I click on the &#8220;Publish&#8221; button after finishing up a blog post, it ends up loading forever and I need to highlight my entire post and copy it and then refresh the page and paste it back in the editing box and hit &#8220;Publish&#8221; again. I even tried hitting &#8220;Save Draft&#8221; before attempting to publish, and while it worked the first time around, that was not indicative of future attempts.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/03/22/i-think-ive-made-a-permanent-move-to-google-chrome/#comment-11683">As someone commented in my last Chrome-related post</a>, the search bar (apparently called the OmniBox?) is not nearly as quick as the Firefox AwesomeBar. It is also much less reliable.</p>
<p>- In preparation for my Song of the Week post yesterday, I attempted to listen to the direct link of &#8220;Sorrow&#8221; only to greeted with a second of painful corruption noise before the song actually started. I thought the song got corrupted during its upload to my webspace, but when I tested it in Firefox, it was totally fine. And when I tested it within its Flash player in the actual blog post, it was also fine. Bizarre.</p>
<p>These complaints aren&#8217;t enough to push me back to Firefox because it&#8217;s much easier to stick with the status quo, and that is now Chrome for me, minor frustrating issues aside. It just sheds some light on why Chrome hasn&#8217;t eaten much into Firefox&#8217;s marketshare; IE has been the browser hurt most by Chrome since the latter&#8217;s release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/22/i-remember-now-why-i-always-end-up-switching-back-to-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Links &#8211; 4/18/10</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/18/weekend-links-41810/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/18/weekend-links-41810/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 04:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dave chappelle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man rape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=2615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend&#8217;s links are presented to you by Dave Chappelle.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLWlBgj0uOc

The All 35-And-Older Team &#8211; A collection of the best old men of baseball, lead by &#8212; who else &#8212; Derek Jeter.
Cutting the Currency Gordian Knot &#8211; This doesn&#8217;t even require a link, since it&#8217;s such a simple idea, but I&#8217;m totally low on links this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This weekend&#8217;s links are presented to you by Dave Chappelle.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLWlBgj0uOc&#038;fmt=18">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLWlBgj0uOc</a></p>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2010/4/13/1419224/the-all-35-and-older-team">The All 35-And-Older Team</a> &#8211; A collection of the best old men of baseball, lead by &#8212; who else &#8212; Derek Jeter.</p>
<p><a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/cutting-the-currency-gordian-knot/">Cutting the Currency Gordian Knot</a> &#8211; This doesn&#8217;t even require a link, since it&#8217;s such a simple idea, but I&#8217;m totally low on links this week &#8212; especially since an awesomely bad YouTube video involving Scott Stapp was taken down.</p>
<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5516305/top-10-ways-to-access-blocked-stuff-on-the-web">Top 10 Ways to Access Blocked Stuff on the Web</a> &#8211; Download YouTube videos, utilize proxies to watch other countries&#8217; streaming TV, read news behind a paywall &#8212; do all this and more!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,687259,00.html">Climate Catastrophe: A Superstorm for Global Warming Research</a> &#8211; A pretty good rundown of Climategate and all the political and societal forces that surround it.</p>
<p><a href="http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2010/04/18/baseball-tweets-a-series/">Baseball Tweets: A Series?</a> &#8211; I am constantly amazed by how much Joe Posnanski is able to write. And he&#8217;s able to do it with referencing Beverly Hills 90210 or some other shitty 90s show, like some other sportswriter that can&#8217;t fit a column into less than 5,000 words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/18/weekend-links-41810/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Did I Move My Blog</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/12/why-did-i-move-my-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/12/why-did-i-move-my-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreamhost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=2597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is purposefully no question mark, ladies and gentleman. It&#8217;s a statement of exasperation.
This blog, The Somewhat Manly Nerd, was originally just another WordPress.com blog. As you can tell by the archives, I started it about three and half years ago (Fuck).
About two years ago, I bought the somewhatmanlynerd.com domain from GoDaddy. But then I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is purposefully no question mark, ladies and gentleman. It&#8217;s a statement of exasperation.</p>
<p>This blog, <strong>The Somewhat Manly Nerd</strong>, was originally just another <a href="http://wordpress.com">WordPress.com</a> blog. As you can tell by the archives, I started it about three and half years ago (<em>Fuck</em>).</p>
<p>About two years ago, I bought the <a href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com">somewhatmanlynerd.com</a> domain from GoDaddy. But then I didn&#8217;t do anything with it for a year. I should have been telling people to go to that URL, while having it redirect to my <a href="http://thesomewhatmanlynerd.wordpress.com">thesomewhatmanlynerd.wordpress.com</a> blog. Instead, I paid 10 bucks for that first year and did nothing with it. By this time, I was getting about 400 hits a day on the blog. Not too many commenters, but certainly more than I&#8217;ve gotten since I moved to self-hosting.</p>
<p>So after that first year of wasting my lame domain, Dreamhost had some deal for four years of hosting for 200 bucks. I figured it was a decent enough time to jump in, if only to have somewhere to host all my GIFs in one place without having to worry about going over my Photobucket bandwidth limit. And I also had wanted to move my blog to self-hosting for a while. I guess the reasons ranged from possibly wanting to put an ad somewhere just for curiosity&#8217;s sake, to not liking any of the themes on WordPress.com, to wanting to be able to use Javascript on my blog.</p>
<p>Moving my blog over to my new webspace about a year ago has resulted in this creation, and I&#8217;m almost as proud of it as the awesome putt I made on a practice green today. A few dozen people read it and a handful of them occasionally comment. But it is kinda maddening that the old version still gets twice the traffic after not being updated in over a year. I shouldn&#8217;t have moved in the first place. I gave up 400 hits a day! Now I&#8217;m lucky if I get that in a week. And I guess pride does factor into it, but I also just miss having massive comment threads like the one I got on <a href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2007/07/26/bear-grylls-is-a-fake/">this Bear Grylls post</a>;Â I like creating discussion with my blog, even if it&#8217;s moronic discussion.</p>
<p>And then I see that WordPress.com now has the very theme I&#8217;m using, and on top of that it&#8217;s being used by an e-friend of mine on her blog <a href="http://babygotbooks.wordpress.com/">Baby Got Books</a>. She was no doubt inspired by me, which is flattering, but it also makes me want to move back. But then I&#8217;d have to give up my nice looking polls, and my Featured Content Gallery, and my embedded Hulu videos. It&#8217;s too much to sacrifice.</p>
<p>I remember I also thought about moving to <a href="http://tumblr.com/">Tumblr</a>, just because people seem very big on reposting stuff from other Tumblr blogs and following people and all that community crap. But that crap allows people to build up readership. I stayed away from Tumblr because I thought every possible theme looked like crap, but I guess there is quite a bit you can do, as evidenced by this Tumblr creation from another e-buddy, <a href="http://htkas.com/">How To Kidnap A Supermodel</a>. If only Tumblr allowed massive GIFs, I would have an awesome Tumblr just for them.</p>
<p>I need to move to a new paragraph, because I&#8217;ve hit the limit for the word &#8220;Tumblr&#8221; contained in one. It does hit that balance between blogging and Twitter. Maybe I&#8217;ll try to make some more awful movie charts and make a Tumblr just for them.</p>
<p>And this is another shitty, boring blog post that I&#8217;m going to end now. I apologize to anyone subscribed to me waking up this Monday morning. Not a good way to start your week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/12/why-did-i-move-my-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Found A Website To Waste My Time On Tonight</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/03/i-found-a-website-to-waste-my-time-on-tonight/</link>
		<comments>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/03/i-found-a-website-to-waste-my-time-on-tonight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 04:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icheckmovies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time wasters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=2559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any website that involves me getting a reward or feedback from repeatedly clicking my mouse is going to grab at least an hour of my time. Flickchart was insanely addictive when I first found it, and once in a blue moon I&#8217;ll decide to add the last few movies I&#8217;ve seen, and then I&#8217;ll end [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any website that involves me getting a reward or feedback from repeatedly clicking my mouse is going to grab at least an hour of my time. <a href="http://www.flickchart.com/">Flickchart</a> was insanely addictive when I first found it, and once in a blue moon I&#8217;ll decide to add the last few movies I&#8217;ve seen, and then I&#8217;ll end up deciding on a handful of new matchups. I joined the site <a href="http://www.goodreads.com">Goodreads</a> recently and adding and ranking the books I could remember reading was a fun exercise as well. Rating movies on <a href="http://www.netflix.com">Netflix</a> gives a similar feeling of satisfaction forÂ minusculeÂ effort; it&#8217;s the formula for addictiveness.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.icheckmovies.com/">ICheckMovies</a> isn&#8217;t nearly the site any of the above are, but it&#8217;s a fun way to keep track of the movies you &#8220;need&#8221; to see. Sure, you could just keep track yourself by looking at the IMDB Top 250 yourself and making a mental note of the fact that <em>Seven Samurai</em> should really be given top priority, but where&#8217;s the needless time-wasting in that? With this website, you can take a quick look at the unchecked movies in that Top 250, or Roger Ebert&#8217;s (338) Great Movies, or The New York Times Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made, or Academy Award Best Pictures, or any of the few dozen lists on the site. Damn, there&#8217;s even a list for A.V. Club&#8217;s New Cult Canon &#8212; that&#8217;s pretty fucking cool.</p>
<p>All I&#8217;ve done so far is go down the IMDB Top 250 list, checking off just over half of the movies. I like the decade breakdown for the movies I&#8217;ve seen:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="lol silent movies" src="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/pics/moviedecades.jpg" alt="" width="408" height="319" /></p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a combination of my own arguably philistine viewing habits and the IMDB Top 250 itself, and the endless stream of content <a href="https://deutschsiptv.de/plane-und-preise/">IPTV Angebote</a>. When <em>The Dark Knight</em> is ranked 10th and<em> (500) Days of Summer</em> is on the list AT ALL, you know there&#8217;s some voter partiality towards newer movies.</p>
<p>I can tell I&#8217;m going to have fun going through all the lists on the site. The idea to bring together so many great lists and allow you to keep easy track of your progress on each is yet another example of why I love the internet, even if sometimes I hate many of the people that populate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2010/04/03/i-found-a-website-to-waste-my-time-on-tonight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
