<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mad Men Had Tentacle Rape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2009/08/17/mad-men-had-tentacle-rape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2009/08/17/mad-men-had-tentacle-rape/</link>
	<description>infrequent blogging from some dude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CajoleJuice</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2009/08/17/mad-men-had-tentacle-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-7221</link>
		<dc:creator>CajoleJuice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=1918#comment-7221</guid>
		<description>I think you win the prize of most erudite comment ever on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you win the prize of most erudite comment ever on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/2009/08/17/mad-men-had-tentacle-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-7209</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somewhatmanlynerd.com/blog/?p=1918#comment-7209</guid>
		<description>Actually the scholarly historical interpretation of this 1814 artwork is that, since it was a dream, the fisherman&#039;s wife&#039;s intimacy with the sea was manifest in the octopi. Could have something to do with tentacles looking marginally penile, though there is no penetration in the image. Anyway, there also are connections to a Japanese myth involving sex with creatures of the sea. Nothing to do with rape, scholars say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the scholarly historical interpretation of this 1814 artwork is that, since it was a dream, the fisherman&#8217;s wife&#8217;s intimacy with the sea was manifest in the octopi. Could have something to do with tentacles looking marginally penile, though there is no penetration in the image. Anyway, there also are connections to a Japanese myth involving sex with creatures of the sea. Nothing to do with rape, scholars say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
